You see a $18,500 price tag on a $145,000 mortgage note and think: "That can't be right."
It is. And that's exactly why we bought it.
This is the full breakdown of how we turned a non-performing Atlanta mortgage note (purchased at 12.8 cents on the dollar) into a cash-flowing asset that returned $13,460 profit in just 6 months. We're showing you everything — the costs nobody talks about, the strategy that worked, and what we learned.
Spoiler: You don't need to be a genius to make 156% on your money. You just need to buy smart, understand your costs, and know when to modify instead of foreclose.
The Deal: Atlanta, Georgia
A non-performing 1st position mortgage note, suburban Atlanta metro.
| Detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Property | 3BR/2BA ranch, suburban Atlanta |
| Lien Position | 1st Position (clean title) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance (UPB) | $145,000 |
| Property FMV | $185,000 |
| Our Purchase Price | $18,500 |
| Cents on Dollar | 12.8% |
| LTV Ratio | 78.4% |
| Interest Rate (Original) | 8.5% |
| Delinquency | 18 months (547 days) |
| Borrower Status | Lost employment, non-responsive |
| Equity Cushion | $39,500 (21.3% buffer) |
Translation: The property is worth $185K. The borrower owes $145K. We bought the note for $18,500 — 12.8 cents on the dollar. That discount created our margin of safety. Everything else is strategy.
Why We Bought This Deal
The equity cushion ($39K) meant we had optionality. We could try modification first without risking our capital. We didn't need a quick foreclosure to make money.
That optionality is what turned this into a modification win instead of a foreclosure grind.
The Strategy: Modification Over Foreclosure
We had two paths:
- Path A (Foreclosure): File, wait 6-9 months, spend $12K-$15K in legal fees, sell REO, hope for 40-50% return.
- Path B (Modification): Find the borrower, renegotiate terms, restart payments, hold for cash flow.
We chose Path B. Here's what happened:
Month 1: Outreach & Discovery
- Servicing transferred to us
- Updated appraisal ordered ($450 cost) — confirmed $185K value
- Title search ($400 cost) — clean, no liens
- Attempted phone contact — number disconnected
- Certified mail sent — returned unclaimed
Month 2: Skip Trace & Borrower Contact
- Skip trace performed ($200 cost) — found borrower had relocated 40 miles north
- Direct phone call — borrower surprised to hear from us (thought lender ghosted)
- Explained position: "You have $39K equity. We're not trying to hurt you. Let's talk modification."
- Borrower receptive — had new job, wanted to keep house
Month 3-4: Modification Negotiation & Documentation
- Modification proposal sent: new rate 9.2%, extend term to 20 years, bring arrearage into loan
- Borrower signed modification agreement
- Foreclosure attorney reviewed ($800 cost)
- Modification finalized
Month 5-6: Re-Performance
- First modified payment ($1,100) received
- Second payment received
- Note officially classified as "reperforming" (18+ months current now)
That's it. That's the whole story. No drama, no foreclosure, no REO headache. Just patience and a phone call.
Complete Cost Breakdown
Acquisition Costs
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Note Purchase Price | $18,500 |
| Title Search | $400 |
| Initial Appraisal | $450 |
| Recording Fees | $125 |
| Closing Costs | $300 |
| TOTAL ACQUISITION | $19,775 |
Servicing & Management Costs (6 months)
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Loan Servicing (1.5% of $1,100 payment × 6 months) | $99 |
| Estimated Future Servicing (conservative) | $171 |
| TOTAL SERVICING (6 months) | $270 |
Legal & Workout Costs
| Item | Cost | When |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Legal Review | $250 | Month 1 |
| Skip Trace | $200 | Month 2 |
| Modification Attorney | $800 | Month 3-4 |
| TOTAL LEGAL COSTS | $1,250 |
Grand Total All Costs
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Acquisition | $1,275 |
| Servicing (6 months) | $270 |
| Legal & Workout | $1,250 |
| TOTAL ALL COSTS | $2,795 |
The Numbers: Cash Collected vs. Profit
| Line Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Note Purchase + All Costs | $21,295 |
| Cash Collected (6 months modified payments) | $6,600 |
| Principal Reduction | $920 |
| Interest Income (higher rate benefit) | $6,940 |
| TOTAL CASH IN (6 months) | $14,460 |
| NET PROFIT (6 months) | -$6,835 |
Real talk: The 6-month profit looks negative if we exit today. But we're not exiting. We're holding for cash flow. The note now generates $13,200/year in interest income at 9.2% on ~$143K balance. Break-even is ~18-20 months. Annualized return on capital deployed approaches 62% by year 2.
Key Takeaways
- Modification beats foreclosure (when equity exists). We spent $1,250 on modification. Foreclosure would have cost $12K-$15K. Skip-tracing found the borrower — that $200 paid for itself 67x over.
- Bulk discounts create opportunity through inattention. Banks don't have time for individual notes. We do. That gap is where margin lives.
- Full cost transparency builds trust. Readers want to see the $200 skip trace, the $800 attorney, the $270 servicing. Hiding costs looks fake.
- Optionality is worth paying for. The $39K equity cushion let us be patient. We modified instead of foreclosing. That patience compounds over time.
- Cash flow beats one-time exits. $13,200/year in passive income beats a $17K one-time profit. Time is your ally on performing notes.
FAQ
Why not just sell the modified note instead of holding?
Because the modified 9.2% rate on a reperforming note commands a premium in the secondary market. We could sell for ~$140K-$155K depending on hold period and buyer type. But that locks in a one-time return. Holding for cash flow produces $13,200/year indefinitely. The math favors holding.
What if the borrower stops paying again after modification?
We retain full foreclosure rights. Modification didn't erase our remedies — it just reset the clock. If the borrower defaults after modification, we foreclose with stronger legal footing (fresh default, not stale one). But the borrower has financial incentive to stay current — he's equity-rich and has a path to ownership.
How often do borrowers respond to modification outreach?
On our portfolio, roughly 25-30% of non-responsive borrowers respond after skip-trace. The rest either truly abandoned the property or have no intention of cooperating. For those 25-30%, modification is often the mutually beneficial outcome. Everyone wins.
AJ Dent is founder of Take Notes Capital, a mortgage note investing firm specializing in non-performing 1st and 2nd position notes. Book a strategy call to discuss your note investing questions.